Análisis de la sentencia N.° 26-18-IN/20 de la inconstitucionalidad del Art. 8 del Decreto 813: frente a la caducidad de la acción subjetiva de plena jurisdicción para el reintegro del servidor público en el Contencioso Administrativo

Abstract

This analysis reviews the legal implications arising from the unconstitutionality of Article 8 of Decree 813, particularly concerning public servants affected by the “purchase of compulsory resignation with compensation.” Judgment No. 26-18-IN/20 does not distinguish between reentry and reinstatement, generating uncertainty regarding the expiration of the subjective action of full jurisdiction for reinstatement. The study examines the applicable legal framework and the criteria established by the Constitutional Court.