Análisis comparativo del sistema constructivo Steel Framing frente a métodos tradicionales como el hormigón armado, en la ciudad de San Juan de los dos ríos de Tena, provincia del Napo, Ecuador

Abstract

The present work analyzes and compares two construction systems for residential structures: the traditional system of reinforced concrete and the innovative Steel Framing. Steel Framing shows an alternative that is viable in contrast to the traditional system, offering significant advantages in terms of speed, economy, safety, and seismic behavior. This analysis is based on a typical structure for residential buildings, considering technical, economic, and social aspects. A structural analysis of the residential building was carried out using both systems, comparing its behavior under different loads and solicitations. An analysis of the cost of unfinished houses was also performed, determining the most economical structure systems in terms of construction. The result of the study demonstrates that Steel Framing presents better performance in contrast to reinforced concrete structures in most of the aspects that were analyzed. Steel Framing is a faster system to build up, which reduces the delivery time of the residential and allows owners to occupy it sooner. In addition, it is the more economical system, with a lower construction cost per meter square. In terms of security, Steel Framing also offers advantages. It is a system that is more resistant to earthquakes, which makes it safer for the occupants of the house. In addition, it is a lighter system, which reduces the load on the foundation and structural elements. Finally, the Steel Framing follows the Ecuadorian construction standards. It is a safe and reliable system that can be used to build residential structures throughout the country.